Home Releases 2021, №3 (39)

The Phenomenon of Cultural Distance in Modern Conditions (Linguistic and Religious Factors)

Philosophy of Culture , UDC: 323.1 DOI: 10.25688/2078-9238.2021.39.3.06

Authors

  • Khilkhanov Dorji Lvovich full professor, Doctor of Sociology
  • Khilkhanova Erzhen Vladimirovna Associate Professor, Dr. Sc. (Linguistics)

Annotation

The phenomenon of cultural distance was described by psychologists A. Furnham and S. Bochner and in the framework of research on the distress experienced by students studying in a foreign culture (the concept of cultural shock). In the modern conditions of the information society, in the conditions of globalization, we observe the processes of actualization of the cultural identity of minority ethnic groups. As a result of the growth of cross-cultural and economic interaction, the phenomenon of transnationalism and the concept of transculturation arise. There is no doubt that cultural distances between ethnic groups tend to gradually decrease, as shown by the data of seven mass surveys of the World Values Survey from 1981 to 2020, but today they are preserved through certain transformations of their basic components: language and religion. The native language of minority ethnic groups, in the modern conditions of globalization, reduces its identification value, which is expressed, among other things, in the appearance of mixed language codes. The use of mixed code is so widespread today that the term translanguaging is very popular. Religious values, since the end of the twentieth century, have become the basis of national cultural revival in post-communist countries, being in fact a compensatory factor for strengthening cultural identity, in the context of the weakening of the language factor. The relevance of the religious factor of cultural distance is confirmed by all modern classifications of cultural differences: the typology of G. Hofstede, R. Inglehart, L. Harrison. Since the 1990s, Russia has been demonstrating the growth of traditional religious values. The role of religious values in the context of post-secularization increases, which leads to an overesti-mation of the significance of these specific factors in the context of cultural distance.

How to link insert

Khilkhanov, D. L. & Khilkhanova, E. V. (2021). The Phenomenon of Cultural Distance in Modern Conditions (Linguistic and Religious Factors) Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2021, №3 (39), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2021.39.3.06
References
1. Chety`rova, L. B. (2011). Rol` buddizma v konstruirovanii e`tnichnosti kalmy`kov i mongolov [The role of Buddhism in the construction of the ethnicity of the Kalmyks and Mongols] // Chetverty`e vostokovedny`e chteniya pamyati O. O. Rosenberga: dokl., st., publikacii [Fourth Oriental Readings in memory of O. O. Rosenberg: reports, articles, publications] (p. 190-196). SPb.: Izd-vo A. Goloda. [in Rus.].
2. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2017). Minority languages and sustainable translanguaging: threat or opportunity? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38 (10), 901-912. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2017.1284855
3. Crede, M., Jong, J., & Harms, P. (2019). The generalizability of transformational leadership across cultures: A meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34 (3), 139-155. DOI: 10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0506
4. Furnham, A. (2019). Culture Shock: A Review of the Literature for Practitioners. Psychology, 10 (13), 1832-1855. DOI: 10.4236/psych.2019.1013119
5. Gabdrakhmanova, G. F. (2020). Yazy`k v sisteme kul`turny`x sostavlyayushhix identichnosti tatar [Language in the system of cultural components of Tatar identity]. Sociolingvistika [Sociolinguistics], 2 (2), 83-91. [in Rus.]. DOI: 10.37892/2713-2951-2020-2-2-83-91
6. Karta yazy`kov Rossijskoj Federacii [Map of the languages of the Rusian Federation]. Retrieved from http://web-corpora.net/wsgi3/minorlangs/ (accessed: 01.10.2019). [in Rus.].
7. Khilkhanova, E. V. (2019). Internet i minoritarny`e yazy`ki Rossii: simvolicheskoe prisutstvie ili instrument revitalizacii? (na primere buryatskogo yazy`ka) [The Internet and Minority Languages of Russia: Symbolic Presence or a Revitalization Tool? (a Case Study of the Buryat Language)]. Mongolovedenie [Mongolian Studies], 11 (4), 967-988. [in Rus.]. DOI: 10.22162/2500-1523-2019-4-967-988
8. Khilkhanova, E. V. (2020). Novy`e tendencii po otnosheniyu k mnogoyazychiyu i minoritarny`m yazy`kam v global`nom masshtabe [New trends in relation to multilingualism and minority languages on a global scale]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Seriya 2. Yazy'koznanie [Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 2: Linguistics], 19 (4), 64-75. [in Rus.]. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.4.6
9. Khilkhanova, E. V. (2019). Sociolinguistic Study of Language Attitudes Among the Buriat and Rusian Youth in the Republic of Buriatiia, Russia. Sibirica, 18 (2), 27-55. DOI: 10.3167/sib.2019.180203
10. Khilkhanova, E. V., & Khilkhanov, D. L. (2020). E`tnokulturnaya identichnost` migrantov iz vostochny`x regionov by`vshego SSSR v svete teorii «stolknoveniya kul`tur» [Ethnocultural identity of migrants from the Eastern regions of the former USSR in the light of the "clash of cultures" theory]. Polilingvial`nost` i transkul`turny`e praktiki [Polylingualism and transcultural practices], 17 (1), 31-38. [in Rus.].DOI: 10.22363/2618-897X-2020-17-1-31-38
11. Latova, N. V. (2016). Kul`turnaya specifika rossiyan (e`tnometricheskij analiz na osnove koncepcii G. Xofsteda) [Cultural Specificity Russians (ethnometrical analysis based on the concept of G. Hofstede)]. Vestnik Instituta Sociologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology], 7 (4), 155-179. [in Rus.]. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2016.19.4.433
12. Harrison, L. E., & Huntington, S. P. (2001). Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. New York: Basic Books. 348 p.
13. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, unit 2. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss1/8 (accessed: 19.02.2021).
14. Hofstede Insights Organisational Culture Consulting. URL: https://www.hofstede-insights.com (accessed: 19.02.2021).
15. Inglhart, R. F. (2018). Cultural evolution: peoples motivations are changing, and reshaping the world. Cambridge University Press, 2, 198-202.
16. Pischloger, C. (2016). Udmurt on Social Network Sites: A Comparison with the Welsh Case. Linguistic Genocide Or Superdiversity? New and Old Language Diversities, 14,108-132.
17. Quijada, J. B., Graber, K. E., & Stephen, E. (2015). Finding "Their Own": Revitalizing Buryat Culture Through Shamanic Practices in Ulan-Ude. Problems of Post-Communism, 62 (5), 258-272. DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2015.1057040
18. The Inglehart-Welzel World Cultural Map. In: WVS Database. Retrieved from https://www. worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp (accessed: 19.02.2021).
19. Timbalari, C. (2019). Dimensions of national culture-cross-cultutal theories. Studies in Business and Economics, 14 (3). DOI: 10.2478/sbe-2019-0055
20. Vakhtin, N. B. (2001). Yazy`ki narodov Severa v XX veke. Ocherki yazy`kovogo sdviga. [Languages of the peoples of the North in the twentieth century. Essays on the language shift]. SPb.: Dmitrij Bulanin. 338 p. [in Rus.].
21. Vserossijskaya perepis` naseleniya 2002 goda [All-Rusian population Census of 2002] (2002). [in Rus.]. Retrieved from http://www.perepis2002.ru/index.html?id=17 (accessed: 01.04.2021).
22. Vserossijskaya perepis` naseleniya 2010 goda [All-Rusian population Census of 2002] (2010). [in Rus.]. Retrieved from https://gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/ perepis_itogi1612.htm (accessed: 01.04.2021).
Download file .pdf 439.23 kb