Home Releases № 3 (59)

MENTORSHIP AS A PRACTICE OF TRANSMITTING SOCIOCULTURAL EXPERIENCE: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH

Research of Young Scientists’ Research , UDC: 130.2 DOI: 10.24412/2078-9238-2026-359-129-138

Authors

  • Spirina Anastasia P. Russian Federation Moscow

Annotation

The article presents a phenomenological analysis of mentorship as a specific anthropo-practice aimed at transmitting socio-cultural experience. In the context of the institutional crisis of traditional educational forms and the proliferation of its instrumentalized versions, the necessity of addressing the essential foundations of this phenomenon is substantiated. Using Husserlian methodology, the author consistently applies the operation of epoche to the description of mentorship, identifying its invariant eidetic core. As a result of this reduction, an interconnected structure of six constitutive elements is revealed: 1) communicative exchange, 2) identification of a specific task, 3) the product of the mentee’s activity as the object of work, 4) task execution as an act of agency, 5) analysis of the product by the mentor, and 6) integration into the community as a teleological horizon. To verify the universality and transhistorical status of the identified core, the ancient practice of «care of the self» and the Christian confessional technique, as described by M. Foucault in “The Hermeneutics of the Subject”, are examined. Based on this, it is concluded that the proposed structure retains its efficacy across different epistemological contexts, while being filled with varying content. The study demonstrates that mentorship is not merely a career development technique or psychological support, but a fundamental socio-anthropological practice of transmitting and assimilating experience, whose logic is revealed through its internal, phenomenologically disclosed architecture.

How to link insert

Spirina, A. P. (2026). MENTORSHIP AS A PRACTICE OF TRANSMITTING SOCIOCULTURAL EXPERIENCE: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 3 (59), 129. https://doi.org/10.24412/2078-9238-2026-359-129-138
References
1. 1. Heidegger, M. (1997). Genesis and time (V. V. Bibikhin, Trans.). Ad Marginem, 1997. (In Russian).
2. 2. Husserl, E. (2009). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy. (A. V. Mikhailov, Trans.; Book one). Akademicheskii Proekt. (In Russian).
3. 3. Kopaneva, V. A. (2022). The phenomenological method in the study of social recognition. In Transcendental turn in modern philosophy – 7. Epistemology, cognitivism and artificial intelligence: Abstracts of the international scientific conference, Moscow, April 21–23, 2022 (pp. 112–113). Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet. (In Russian).
4. 4. Averintsev, S. S. (2004). Poetics of early Byzantine literature. Azbuka-klassika. (In Russian).
5. 5. Girard, R. (2010). Violence and the sacred (G. Dashevsky, Trans.). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).
6. 6. Gurevich, P. S. (2009). The fracturedness of human existence. IF RAN. (In Russian).
7. 7. Seneca, Lucius Annaeus (1977). Moral letters to Lucilius (S. A. Osherov, Trans.). Nauka. (In Russian).
8. 8. Husserl, E. (1998). Cartesian meditations (D. V. Sklyadnev, Trans.) Nauka. (In Russian).
9. 9. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1994). On the phenomenology of language (V. M. Rykunov, Trans.). Logos, (6), 179–193. (In Russian).
10. 10. Foucault, M. (2007). Hermeneutics of the subject: a course of lectures delivered at the Collège de France in the 1981–1982 academic year (A. G. Pogoniailo, Trans.). Nauka. (In Russian).
Download file .pdf 294.95 kb