Authors
- Trubina Natalia Akekseevna Candidate of Philosophical Sciences
- Mirkushina Lia Rafikovna Candidate of Philosophical Sciences
Annotation
The article is devoted to the active development of the digitalization of public life, an intensified factor of which was the coronavirus pandemic. The result there is a process of moving communication into the digital space, transposing the vector of society’s value relations. The purpose of the study was to verify the hypothesis about the transformation of moral values in digital communication using an empirical method. The results of the study found that the prerequisites for change are being formed, which distinguishes this study from the previous ones, in which the fact of a complete transformation of moral values and the transition of the modern young generation to the values of the digital environment was previously established. It was found that for the modern young generation, traditional moral values, in particular love and friendship, still remain significant, despite the fact that they are being transferred to a digital format. To date, a moral code has not been formed for building relationships in the digital environment, therefore, it is impossible to track the state of moral values in digital communication, which are of a relative nature, without resorting to empirical methods. The significance of solving this problem through the indicated approach is determined by the fact that a person and moral values in digital reality are a new problem field of modern philosophical anthropology and axiology. The future of society, its spiritual and moral foundations depend on the state of moral values in the modern digital environment. Additional attention to the problem of values in digital communication will help in addressing ethical principles and the formation of a stable environment in society in the future, reducing anxiety and psychological tension. Comprehensive characteristics make it possible to fully assess
the scale and dynamics of the digital transition stage, its risks, because such a social agenda will entail an adjustment of the strategy at the state level.
How to link insert
Trubina, N. A. & Mirkushina, L. R. (2022). TRANSFORMATION OF MORAL VALUES IN DIGITAL COMMUNICATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №3 (43), 44. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2022.43.3.4
References
1.
1. Baeva, L. V. (2020). Informacionnaja e`tika v uslovijah razvitija e`lektronnoj kul`tury`. [Information ethics in the development of electronic culture]. Information society, 6, 36–46. (In Russian).
2.
2. Barque-Duran, А., Pothos, E., Hampton, J. A., & Yearsle, J. M. (2017). Contemporary morality: Moral judgments in digital contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 184–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.020
3.
3. Botz-Borstein, T. (2004). Virtual Reality and Dreams. Towards the Autistic Condition? Philosophy in the Contemporary World, 11 (2), 43–49. DOI: 10.5840/pcw200411218
4.
4. Boyd, D. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.). Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Networking Sites (pp. 39–58). Retrived from https://www.danah.org/papers/2010/SNSasNetworkedPublics.pdf
5.
5. Danilkina, T. V. (2021). Antropologicheskie i aksiologicheskie aspekty` anonimnosti kommunikacii. [Anthropological and axiological aspects of the anonymity of communication]. News of the Tula State University. Humanitarian sciences, 2, 176–188. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2071-6141-2021-2-176-188
6.
6. Dijk J., V. (2006). The Network Society. Social Aspects of New Media. Retrived from http://www.bookre.org/reader?file=1244491
7.
7. Kasavina, N. A. (2018). Chelovek i tehnika: ambivalentnost` e`lektronnoj kul`tury`. [Man and technology: the ambivalence of electronic culture]. Epistemology and philosophy of science, 55 (4), 129–142. (In Russian). DOI: 10.5840/eps201855479
8.
8. Krasnojarova, N. G., & Trubina, N. A. (2013). Modal`nosti ljubvi v by`tii cheloveka. [Modalities of love in human existence]. Human Science: Humanities Research, 12, 126–130. (In Russian). Retrived from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21041289
9.
9. Kramer, E., & Faustino, M. (2021). Reconstructing Professional Philosophy: Lessons from Philosophy as a Way of Life During a Time of Crises. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 77 (2–3), 513–546. DOI: 10.17990/rpf/2021_77_2_0513
10.
10. Molchan, Je. M. (2019). Vlijanie cifrovizacii na formirovanie duhovno-nravstvenny`h cennostej sub`ektov vzaimodejstvija v jepohu globalizacii. [The impact of digitalization on the formation of spiritual and moral values of the subjects of interaction in the era of globalization]. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University, 2, 55–66. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18384/ 2310-7227-2019-2-55-66
11.
11. Osinceva, N. V., & Muratova, I .A. (2020). Transformacija e`ticheskih cennostej v uslovijah razvitija cifrovy`h tehnologij. [Transformation of ethical values in the context of the development of digital technologies]. Manuscript, 13 (1), 171–175. (In Russian). DOI: 10.30853/manuscript.2020.1.35
12.
12. Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The Virtual Geographies of Social Networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, Linked In and ASmallWorld. New Media & Society, 11, 199–220. Retrived from https://www.academia.edu/4714527/The_virtual_geographies_of_social_networks_a_comparative_analysis_of_Facebook_LinkedIn_and_ASmallWorld
13.
13. Patridge, S. (2011). The Incorrigible Social Meaning of Video Game Imagery. Ethics and Information Technology, 13, 303–312. DOI: 10.1007/s10676-010-9250-6
14.
14. Podstrahova, A. V. (2019). Pokolenie «cifrovogo veka»: zhiznenny`e orientiry` i obrazovatel`ny`e cennosti [Generation of the «digital age»: life guidelines and educational values]. Young scientist, 15 (253), 287–290. (In Russian). Retrived from https://moluch.ru/archive/253/58044/
15.
15. Toffler, A., & Toffler H. (2007). Revolutionary Wealth. Retrived from https://books. google.ru/books?id=bhIR2PD6zaoC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false
16.
16. Touraine, A. (2014). After the Crisis. Retrived from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281608269_After_the_CrisisBy_Alain_Touraine_Cambridge_Polity_Press_2014_first_published_in_French_2010
17.
17. Usmanova, L. R., & Baeva, L. V. (2013). Zhenshhina kak hranitel` semejny`h cennostej v Rossii (na osnove analiza filosofskogo tvorchestva V. V. Rozanova) [Woman as a guardian of family values in Russia (based on the analysis of the philosophical work of V. V. Rozanov)]. Caspian region: politics, economics, culture, 1 (34), 161–165. (In Russian). Retrived from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18981966
18.
18. Faktor, A. M., Kamolov, S. G. & Nikandorova A. A. (2018). Chelovecheskie cennosti v cifrovuju e`pohu. [Human values in the digital age]. Modeling, optimization and information technologies, 2 (21), 86–103. (In Russian). Retrived from http://smart-city.institute/researches/FactorSoavtors_2_18_1.pdf
19.
19. Chudakova, E. A., & Batorova, T. V. (2018). Vlijanie Interneta na nravstvenny`e cennosti molodezhi [The influence of the Internet on the moral values of young people]. (In Russian). Retrived from https://videouroki.net/razrabotki/vliianiie-intiernieta-nanravstviennyie-tsiennosti-molodiezhi.html