Authors
- Maslova Anastasia Vladilenovna Candidate of Philosophical Sciences
Annotation
The article is devoted to the study of psychological imagination, which is activated in the process of creating the characters of a literary work, as well as in the process
of perception of another person. We consider imagination as a cognitive ability, which is part of consciousness and has the power to influence the psychological reality of the person. On the one hand, imagination is a link between perception and a holistic image of reality, on the other hand, it allows to go beyond one’s own personality and see the diversity of manifestation of another way of existence. The concept of nuclear affects, created at the crossroads of psychiatry, psychology and philosophy, is taken as the basis of the analysis, based on real psychiatric practice. According to this concept, there are three different moduses of human existence, each of which unlocks reality in its own way. And each person possesses only one of the three modes of existence, which limits his perception of the world. Imagination, however, as a possibility
of transcendence, makes it possible to transcend one’s psychological limitations and literally “see” the essential qualities of another, different from one’s mode of existence. Moreover, such imagination becomes psychological insofar as it seeks to understand, through feeling, the nuclear structure of another person or the hero of a literary work. In this paper, the concept of nuclear affects allows us to articulate the significance of psychological imagination as the ability to see the integrity of human nature. Using the example of the creation of the characters in F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel The Brothers Karamazov, the work of psychological imagination is demonstrated as a moment of psychological completion of the characters’ personalities, which corresponds to the function of intuition. It is intuition as a boundary ability between the conscious and the unconscious that is included in the creative process of the work of the psychological imagination. In this way we get a hybrid intuitive ability to penetrate into the essential, nuclear structure of human psyche.
How to link insert
Maslova, A. V. (2022). EPISTEMOLOGICAL ANALYSES OF IMAGINATION IN THE LITERATURE WORK: THE ROLE OF INTUITION IN THE PROCESS OF CREATING HEROES Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №2 (42), 66. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2022.42.2.06
References
1.
1. Bazhanov, V. A. (2016). Social`no-kul`turnaya revolyuciya v nejronauke: novy`e grani kantianskoj programmy` [The Socio-Cultural Revolution in Neuroscience: New Facets of the Kantian Program]. Question of philosophy, 8, 126–138. (In Russian).
2.
2. Dispenza, D. (2018). Sverhestestvennyj razum. Kak obychnye lyudi delayut nevozmozhnoe s pomoshch’yu sily podsoznaniya [A Supernatural mind. How ordinary people do the impossible with the power of the subconscious]. Moscow: E. 560 p. (In Russian).
3.
3. Gasparyan, D. E. (2020). Fenomenologiya bez transcendental`nogo sub``ekta: nejrofenomenologiya i enaktivizm v poiskah perspektivy` ot pervogo lica [Phenomenology without a transcendental subject: Neurophenomenology and enactivism in search of a first-person perspective]. Philosophy magazine, 13, 1, 80–96. (In Russian).
4.
4. Knyazeva, E. N. & Kurdyumov, S. P. (1994). Intuiciya kak samodostraivanie [Intuition as self-construction]. Questions of philosophy, 2, 110–122. (In Russian).
5.
5. Kon, E. (2018). Kak myslyat lesa: k antropologii po tu storonu cheloveka [How forests think: Towards anthropology on the other side of man]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. 344 p. (In Russian).
6.
6. Koneva, A. V. (2016). Ponyatie i struktura social`nogo voobrazheniya [The Concept and the Structure of Social Imagination]. Questions of philosophy, 5, 51–60. (In Russian).
7.
7. Lazarus, A. (2000). Myslennym vzorom: Obrazy kak sredstvo psihoterapii [In the mind’s eye: The power of Imagery for personal Enrichment]. 144 p. Moscow: Klass. (In Russian).
8.
8. Leshkevich, T. G. (2018). «Soznanie, tvoryashchee real`nost`». Est` li vy`hod iz slovesnogo labirinta? [“Consciousness creates reality”. Is there a way out of the verbal labyrinth?] // Epistemology and philosophy of science, 55, 2, 220–227. (In Russian).
9.
9. Ly`zlov A.V., Seravina O.B., & Kovalevskaya O.F. (2013) Apatiya kak yadernyj affekt: opyt strukturno-psihologicheskogo analiza [Apathy as a nuclear affect: experience of structuralpsychological analysis]. Questions of psychology. Voprosy psihology, 2, 65–79. (In Russian).
10.
10. Ly`zlov, A. V., Seravina, O. B., & Kovalevskaya, O. F. (2012). Toska kak yaderny`j affekt: opy`t strukturno-psihologicheskogo analiza [Longing as a nuclear affectexperience of structural-psychological analysis]. Questions of psychology, 5, 62–72. (In Russian).
11.
11. Ly`zlov, A. V., Seravina, O. B., & Kovalevskaya, O. F. (2011). Trevoga kak yaderny`j affekt: opy`t strukturno-psihologicheskogo analiza [Anxiety as a nuclear affect: experience of structural-psychological analysis]. Questions of psychology, 4, 66–77. (In Russian).
12.
12. Ly`zlov, A. V., Seravina, O. F., & Kovalevskaya, O. B. (2011). Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya i affektivnost` [Phenomenology of perception and affectivity]. Questions of psychology, 2, 101–111. (In Russian).
13.
13. Nansi, Zhan-Lyuk. (1999). Corpus. Moscow: Ad marginem. 255 p. (In Russian).
14.
14. Negus, K., & Pikering M. (2011). Kreativnost’ [Creativity]. 299 p. Kharkov: Gumanitarny` j Center. (In Russian).
15.
15. N`yuberg, E., & Uoldman M. R. (2012). Kak Bog vliyaet na nash mozg: Revolyucionnye otkrytiya v nejrobiologii [Hiw God impacts our brain: Revolutionary discoveries in neurobiology]. Moscow: Eksmo. (In Russian).
16.
16. Plesner, G. (2004). Stupeni organicheskogo i chelovek: Vvedenie v filosofskuyu antropologiyu [The levels of organic and human: Introduction to philosophical anthropology] Moscow: ROSSPEN. 367 p. (In Russian).
17.
17. Ryle, G. (1999). Ponyatie soznaniya [The notion of consciousness]. Moscow: Ideya-Press; Dom intellektual`noj knigi. 408 p. (In Russian).
18.
18. Shohin, V. K. (2021). Tak nazy`vaemy`j paradoks hudozhestvennoj literatury i transcendental’nyya ontologiya [The so-called paradox of fiction and transcendental ontology]. Philosophy journal, 14, 1, 20–35. (In Russian).
19.
19. Tanyushina, A. A. (2021). Virtual`ny`j realizm, informacionnaya ontologiyasoznaniya i strukturny`j realizm v filosofii Devida Chalmersa [Virtual realism, i nformation ontology of consciousness and structural realism in the philosophy of David Chalmers]. Philosophy journal, 14, 4, 53–64. (In Russian).
20.
20. Vel`tish’ev, D. Yu. (2006). Affektivnaya model` stressovy`h rasstrojstv: psihicheskaya travma, yaderny`j affekt i depressivnyj spektr [The affective model of stress disorder: trauma, nuclear affect and the depressive spectrum]. Social’naya i klinicheskaya psihiatriya, 1, 3, 104–108. (In Russian).
21.
21. Vilirio, P. (2004). Mashina zreniya [The vision machine]. Sankt Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russian).