Home Releases 2021, №4 (40)

The Semiotics of Advertising by R. Barthes

Theory of Knowledge , UDC: 165.2 DOI: 10.25688/2078-9238.2021.40.4.07

Authors

  • Chernenkaya Svetlana Vasilievna PhD (philosophy), PhD (philosophy)

Annotation

The article considers the approach of the French semiotic R. Barth to the study of an advertising message. According to Barth, text analysis makes it possible to bring the structure of the message into motion and identify those forms through which the meaning of the text manifests and changes. Noting that the ordinary idea of advertising does not grasp all the many meanings contained in an advertising message, he highlights some practices of reading and interpreting it. Comparing advertising with a cultural gesture, Barth emphasizes the polyvalence of the signifier in the advertising message. At the same time, he gives a typology of the images (plots) of the advertising message. The use of structural analysis will allow the French semiotics to consider the correlation of the visual and verbal code on the example of an advertising message, to reveal the mechanisms of ideological influence in visual images, to identify the signifying mechanisms of ideology. In the modern culture of mass replication of visual images, the tools of the Bart analysis of advertising have not lost their relevance. In general, the practices of reading and interpreting the visual image, highlighted by R. Barth, can become material for the development of new communicative models, or, as R. Barth himself wrote, “productivity points” that allow us to advance modern research.

How to link insert

Chernenkaya, S. V. (2021). The Semiotics of Advertising by R. Barthes Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2021, №4 (40), 77. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2021.40.4.07
References
1. 1. Bart, R. (1989a). Ritorika obraza [The rhetoric of the image]. In Izbranny`e raboty`: semiotika, poe`tika [Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics] (pp. 297–318). Moscow: Progress. [in Russian].
2. 2. Bart, R. (1989b). Effekt real`nosti [Reality Effect]. In Izbranny`e raboty`: semiotika, poe`tika [Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics] (pp. 392–400). [in Russian].
3. 3. Bart, R. (1989c). Smert` avtora [Death of the author]. In Izbranny`e raboty`: semiotika, poe`tika [Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics] (pp. 384–391). [in Russian].
4. 4. Bart, R. (1975). Osnovy semiologii [Fundamentals of semiology]. Strukturalizm: «za» i «protiv» [Structuralism: “for” and “against”]. Moscow: Progress. [in Russian].
5. 5. Bart, R. (2008). Mifologii [Mythology] (Zenkina, S., Tr. from fr., introductory article and comment.). Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt. [in Russian].
6. 6. Chernenkaya, S. V. (2010). Semioticheskie issledovaniia Gustava Shpeta [Semiotic studies by Gustav Shpet]. In T. G. Shchedrina (Sc. Ed.). Gustav Shpet i ego filosofskoe nasledie: u istokov semiotiki i strukturalizma [Gustav Shpet and his Philosophical Legacy: at the Origins of Semiotics and Structuralism]: Collective monograph (pp. 446–453). Moscow: ROSSPEN. [in Russian].
7. 7. Chernenkaya, S. V. (2017). Filosofiia iazyka [ Philosophy of language]: Guide. Moscow: MCU. [in Russian].
8. 8. Eko, U. (2006). Otsutstvuiushchaia struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiiu [ Missing structure. Introduction to Semiology] (Reznik, V. G., & Pogonyajlo, A. G., Tr. from It.) Saint Petersburg: Simpozium. [in Russian].
9. 9. Karluchcho, D. (2018). Tekst kak stop-kadr: Rolan Bart i chtenie v sovremennuiu epokhu [Text as a freeze frame: Roland Barthes and reading in the modern era]. In Zenkin, V., & Fokin, S. (Eds.). Chto nam delat` s Rolanom Bartom?: Materials of the International Conference, St. Petersburg, 2015, December (pp. 100–113). Moscow: NLO. [in Russian].
10. 10. Lotman, Yu. M. (1992). Tekst kak semioticheskaia problema [Text as a semiotic problem]. In Izbrannye stat`i [Selected articles] (v 3 vol., Vol. 1. Stat`i po semiotike i tipologii kul`tury [Articles on semiotics and typology of culture]). Tallinn: Aleksandra. [in Russian].
11. 11. Teliya, V. N. (1986). Konnotativnyi aspekt semantiki nominativnykh edinits [Connotative aspect of the semantics of nominative units]. Moscow: Nauka. [in Russian].
12. 12. Shulga, N. N., & Bukreeva, A. N. (2013). Voploshchenie voobrazhaemykh obrazov v khudozhestvennom tvorchestve [The embodiment of imaginary images in artistic creativity]. Problema voobrazheniia v evoliutsionnoi epistemologii [The problem of imagination in evolutionary epistemology] (pp. 166–184). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences. [in Russian].
13. 13. Vasyukov V. L., Kiseleva M. S., & Shulga E. N. (2019). Teoreticheskie modeli kommunikatsii i istoricheskie rekonstruktsii [Theoretical models of communication and historical reconstructions]. Moscow: Nauka. ISBN 978-5-02-040226-3
Download file .pdf 267.72 kb