Authors
- Vasiliev Vladimir Viktorovich Associate Professor, PhD (History)
Annotation
The article analyzes the specific features and characteristics of the analysis of the phenomenon of social uncertainty in the non-classical research paradigm: rejection
of universal positive foundations and focusing on methodological pluralism, existentialism and relativism. The article notes that the non-classical approach to the analysis of social phenomena is characterized by increased attention to sociocultural and sociopsychological diversity, which allows us to conclude about the role of ethical and value orientations, as well as the relevance of the intellectual and psychological characteristics of the cognizing subject to the emergence of social uncertainty. The author emphasizes the key importance given in the post-nonclassical scientific paradigm to the theory of self-organization, the interdisciplinary nature of which makes it possible to understand social uncertainty as a key characteristic of complex, open and uneven systems and a necessary element that determines the prospects for social development.
How to link insert
Vasiliev, V. V. (2021). The Phenomenon of Social Uncertainty in a Non-Classical (Post-Non-Classical) Research Paradigm: Specific Features and Characteristics Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2021, №4 (40), 9. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2021.40.4.01
References
1.
1. Arbachauskas, V. O. (2014). Samoorganizatsiia i ustoichivost` ekonomicheskikh sistem v kontekste ikh evoliutsionnoi dinamiki [Self-organization and stability of economic systems in the context of their evolutionary dynamics] // Bulletin of Chel, 9 (338). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/samoorganizatsiya-
i-ustoychivostekonomicheskih-sistem-v-kontekste-ih-evolyutsionnoy-dinamiki (2021, March, 20). [in Russian].
2.
2. Arefieva, N. T. (2009). Sinergetika kak metodologiia sotsiokul`turnogo prognozirovaniia [Synergetics as a methodology of socio-cultural forecasting]. Vestnik MGUKI, 6, 27–32. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sinergetika-kak-metodologiya-sotsiokulturnogoprognozirovaniya (2021, August, 18). [in Russian].
3.
3. Vorobyov, G. A. (2016). Sotsial`naia entropiia v predmetnom prostranstve sotsial`nofilosofskogo izucheniia [Social entropy in the subject space of social and philosophical study]. In Ofitsial`nyi sait Piatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [The official website of Pyatigorsk State University.] https://pgu.ru/upload/iblock/e60/20.pdf (2021, August, 21). [in Russian].
4.
4. Vorobyov, G. A. (2017). Sotsial`naia entropiia i sotsial`no-politicheskaia neopredelennost` v prostranstve vosproizvodstva sotsial`noi real`nosti v rossiiskom obshchestve [Social entropy and socio-political uncertainty in the space of reproduction of social reality in Russian society]. Humanitarian and Social Sciences, 4, 11–20. [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.18522/2070-1403-2017-63-4-11-20 Социальная философия 19
5.
5. Guralnik, I. A. (2004). Perspektivy formirovaniia sinergeticheskogo podkhoda k analizu sotsial`nykh iavlenii i protsessov [Prospects for the formation of a synergetic approach to the analysis of social phenomena and processes]. Proceedings of the Far Eastern State Technical University, 138, 61–64. [in Russian].
6.
6. Dorozhkin, A. M., & Pakina, T. A. (2010). Fenomen nauchnoi neopredelennosti: analiz problemy [The phenomenon of scientific uncertainty: analysis of the problem]. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University. Series «Social Sciences», 4 (20), 150–156. [in Russian].
7.
7. Zhukotskaya, A. V. (2014). Sindrom postsovetskogo obshchestva: ot «eticheskogo anarkhizma» k sotsial`noi deviatsii [The syndrome of post-Soviet society: from “ethical anarchism” to social deviation]. MCU Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 4 (12), 79–86. [in Russian].
8.
8. Knyazeva, E. N. (2019). Neopredelennost` kak vyzov dlia istoricheskogo tvorchestva [Uncertainty as a challenge for historical creativity]. In G. L. Belkina (Ed.), M. I. Frolova (Ed.-Comp.), S. N. Korsakova, & M. I. Frolova (Preface). Mir cheloveka: neopredelennost` kak vyzov [The world of man: uncertainty as a challenge] (pp. 111–125). M.: LЕNАND. [in Russian].
9.
9. Kolesova, O. V. (2003). Postneklassicheskaia paradigma v tsennostnom rakurse [Postnonclassical paradigm from a value perspective]. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod St. Un-ty. N. I. Lobachevsky. Series «History», 1 (2), 184–188. Nizhny Novgorod: Publishing house of NNSU. [in Russian].
10.
10. Pakina, T. A. (2012). Trudovaia sotsializatsiia molodezhi v sovremennykh usloviiakh zaniatosti [Labor socialization of youth in modern employment conditions]. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod St. Un-ty. N. I. Lobachevsky. Series «Social Sciences», 2 (26), 39–46. [in Russian].
11.
11. Khitsenko, V. E. (n.d.). Fenomen sotsial`noi samoorganizatsii [The phenomenon of social self-organization]. In Sait S. P. Kurdiumova [Website of S. P. Kurdyumov]. https://spkurdyumov.ru/uploads//2013/08/Hits.pdf (2021, March, 20). [in Russian].