Authors
- Shulga Elena Nikolayevna Doctor of Science (Philosophy), Doctor of Science (Philosophy)
Annotation
The perception of reality through things and symbols have an archaic nature origin deeply rooted in the public awareness which goes back to the preliterate culture
with its mnemonic tokens and symbolic of modus operandi. One of the forms of such activity is exactly the game. Game culture for some archaic civilizations had a ritual meaning linking with the magic and religious practice. The special kind of games deriving from the deep antiquity in many cultures has been consisted of testing the skill of answering questions of any kind. In ancient religious rituals the questions which priests by turns asked one another during the sacrifice though are similar to the usual riddles but they concern an ultra-mundane knowledge: on sacral things and secret names, on the origin of life and the repeatability of nature phenomena. The sacral game of such a kind leads to the emergence of philosophy since to be over the run of life means to construct some worldview structure assigning in it the room both for the weird, sacral and for the ordinary, routine. Modern intellectually advanced men treat the game not completely serious but even during the discussing quite serious matters the specificity of game behavior becomes mostly relevant. Child games making ready for any kind of human activity and at the same time they by their activity itself preserve memories of the past experience in the sense that the experience is in essence the continuing communication. Its continuity is reproduced in the “game
culture” where the mimesis seizes gamers determining their way of thinking and activity. Thus, the game culture of human society is based on the structure of worldview going back besides, from the one hand, to the ancient forms of cognitive human activity (cognitive ontogenesis), and, from the second hand, making ready for any kind of human activity, determining the way of thinking and acting in future (cognitive phylogenies).
How to link insert
Shulga, E. N. (2021). Encoding the Worldview Structure with Gaming Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2021, №4 (40), 67. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2021.40.4.06
References
1.
1. Althoff, G. (2019). Rules and Rituals in Medieval Power Games: A German Perspective. Leiden: Brill. [in Russian]. ISBN 9789004408487, 9004408487
2.
2. Arlandis, S., & Reyes-Torres A. (2018). Thresholds of Change in Children`s Literature: The Symbol of the Mirror. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7, 2, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.275 (Scopus)
3.
3. Bender, A. (2020). What Early Sapiens Cognition Can Teach Us: Untangling Cultural Influences on Human Cognition Across Time. Front. Psychol, 11, 99. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00099 (Scopus).
4.
4. Eris vs., Aemulatio. (2019). Valuing Competition in Classical Antiquity (Damon, C., & Pieper, C., Eds.). Brill. ISBN: 978-90-04-38396-8
5.
5. Girard, R. (2010). Kozel otpushcheniia [The Scapegoat] (Dashevsky, G., Tr. from FR; Etkind, A., Pref.). SPb.: Ivan Limbakh Publ. [in Russian].
6.
6. Huizinga, J. (2011). Homo ludens. Chelovek igraiushchii [Homo Ludens. Those who play]. (Sylvestrov, D. V., Сomp., preface and tr. from the Netherlands; Kharitonovich, D. E., Comment., index). SPb.: Ivan Lymbach Publ. [in Russian].
7.
7. Hintikka, J. (2013). O Vitgenshteine. Liudvig Vitgenshtein — iz «lektsii» i «zametok» [About Wittgenstein. Ludwig Wittgenstein — from ‘lectures` and ‘notes`] (Surovtsev, V. A., Comp. and ed.). Мoscow: Canon+; Reabilitatsiya Publ. [in Russian].
8.
8. Jaskevich, J. S. (2017). Filosofskie problemy sotsial`noi kommunikatsii [Philosophical problems of social communications]. Minsk: Vysheishaia
shkola. [in Russian]. ISBN 978-985-06-2892-3
9.
9. Levi-Strauss, C. (1974). Pervobytnoe myshlenie [The savage mind] (Ostrovsky, A. B., Tr., int. and notes). Moscow: Respublika. [in Russian]. ISBN 5-250-01682-6
10.
10. Leontiev, A. N. (2000). Lektsii po obshchei psikhologii [Lectures on general psychology]. Moscow: Smysl. [in Russian].
11.
11. Naydysh, V. M. (2012). Nauka drevneishikh tsivilizatsii. Filosofskii analiz [Science of the ancient civilizations. A Philosophical analysis]. Moscow: Al`fa-M. [in Russian]. ISBN 978-3-98281-345-2
12.
12. Rybakov, В. A. (1987). Iazychestvo Drevnei Rusi [Paganism of the Ancient Russia]. Moscow: Nauka. [in Russian].
13.
13. Kramsch, C. (2020). Language as Symbolic Power (Key Topics in Applied Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/978110 8869386
14.
14. Lewis, Hall E., & Hill, P. (2019). Meaning-making, suffering, and religion: a worldview conception. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 22, 5, 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2019.1625037 (Scopus).
15.
15. Lotem, A., Halpern, J. Y, Edelman, S., & Kolodny, O. (2017). The evolution of cognitive mechanisms in response to cultural innovations. PNAS, 114, 30, 7915–7922. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620742114
16.
16. Renfrew, C., Morley, I., & Boyd, M. (Eds.). (2018). Ritual, Play, and Belief in Evolution and Early Human Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN 9781108547512, 1108547516
17.
17. Satne, G. (2016). A Two-Step Theory of the Evolution of Human Thinking. Journal of Social Ontology, 2, 1, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2015-0053 (Scopus).
18.
18. Taylor, E. B. (2019). Pervobytnaia kul`tura [Primitive Culture] (Koropchevski, D. A., & Ivin, A., Tr.; Nikolsky, V. K. (Ed.). Мoscow: Yurait. [in Russian]. https://urait.ru/bcode/429314
19.
19. Vasyukov, V. L., Kiseleva, M. S., Shulga, E. N. (2019). Teoreticheskie modeli kommunikatsii i istoricheskie rekonstruktsii [Theoretical models of communications and historical reconstructions]. Moscow: Nauka. [in Russian]. ISBN 978-5-02-040226-3
20.
20. Wittgenstein, L. Filosofskie raboty [Philosophical works] (Kozlova, М. S., & Aseev, Yu. A., Tr.; Part I). Мoscow: Gnosis. [in Russian].