Authors
- Dzhuad Yuliya Yurevna Cand. Sci (Philosophy)
Annotation
The article examines intercultural inclusion as a component of the concept of an inclusive society and as one of the aspects of sociocultural inclusion. Interdisciplinary analysis includes: historical consideration of the problem of intercultural inclusion as part of the concept of an inclusive society; ethnopsychological consideration of the problem of intercultural communication, the formation of intercultural competence and the role of intercultural sensitivity; philosophical (historical-philosophical, socio-philosophical and sociocultural) consideration of the context of emergence and ways to overcome obstacles that arise on the path of intercultural inclusion in the context
of modern Russian society. The results of interdisciplinary analysis made it possible to formulate recommendations for subjects of intercultural communication and identify the field of education as the optimal environment for the development of intercultural competence, which is the most important condition for the implementation of the intercultural inclusion project in our society.
How to link insert
Dzhuad, Y. Y. (2024). INERCULTURAL INCLUSION: SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-PHILSOPHICAL ANALYSIS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 2 (50), 8. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2024.50.2.1
References
1.
1. Lyotard, J. F. (1998). The Postmodern Condition. St. Peterburg: Aleteiia Press. 160 p. (In Russian).
2.
2. Auge, M. (2017). Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publishing House. 136 p. (In Russian).
3.
3. Vermeulen, T., & Van Den Akker, R. (n. d.). Notes on metamodernism. METAMODERN is a magazine about metamodernism. (In Russian). Retrieved ffrom https://metamodernizm.ru/notes-on-metamodernism/
4.
4. Bell, D. (2004). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Moscow: Academia Press. 944 p. (In Russian).
5.
5. McLuhan, M. (2005). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt Press. 496 p. (In Russian).
6.
6. Makar`ev, I. S. (2015). A Brief Dictionary of the System of Concepts of Inclusive Education: terminological dictionary. St. Petersburg: Okhta College. 84 p. (In Russian).
7.
7. Ratner, F. L., & Segal, N. G. (2012). History of Inclusive Education Ideas Formation and Development: International Expirience. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Gramota Press, 12 (26): at 3 part, part II, 162–167. (In Russian). Retrieved from www.gramota.net/materials/3/2012/12-2/38.html
8.
8. Babat, K., & Kinunen, T. (2022). Diversity. Inclusivity. Equality. The First Book about Diversity & Inclusion in Russian. (In Russian). Retrieved from http://www.litres.ru/pages/biblio_book/?art=68792073SelfPub
9.
9. Mirkushina, L. R. (2014). The image of a Woman in Russian Religious Philosophy and Cultural Tradition of the late nineteenth century. XX century. Dissertation of the Candidate of Philosophical Sciences. Astrakhan. 192 p.
10.
10. Omelchenko, E. A., Teplova, E. F., & Shevtsova, A. A. (2019). Formation of intercultural competence. Methodological approaches and test materials. A textbook manual. Moscow: MCU.
11.
11. Khukhlaev, O. E., Pavlova, O. S., & Khakimov, E. R. et al. (2021). Measuring Intercultural Competence in Teachers: Development and Evaluation of Situational Judgment Test. Psychological Science and Education, 26 (6), 46–57. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2021260603
12.
12. Khukhlaev, O. E., Gritsenko, V. V., Pavlova, O. S. et al. (2020a). Comprehensive Model of Intercultural Competence: Theoretical Substantiation. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 17 (1), 13–28. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-1-13-28
13.
13. The New Testament. Gospel of Matthew. The Russian Orthodox Church: the official website of the Moscow Patriarchate. (In Russian). Retrieved from http://www.patriarchia.ru/bible/mf/
14.
14. The Quran Online (n. d.). The Holy Quran. (In Russian). Retrieved from https://quran-online.ru/
15.
15. Fornet-Betancourt, R. (2022). The Modern World as a Challenge for Intercultural Philosophy. Comparative Philosophy: From Comparative to Intercultural Philosophy (pp. 304–317). Moskow: Nauka Press; Vostochnaia Literatura Press. (In Russian).
16.
16. Soldatova, G., & Makarchuk, A. (2006). Can the “other” become a friend? Training on the prevention of xenophobia. Moscow: Genezis Press. 256 p. (In Russian).
17.
17. Khukhlaev, O. E., Aleksandrova, E. A., Gritsenko, V. V. et al. (2019). Religious Group Identification and Ethno-National Attitudes in Buddhist, Muslim and Orthodox Youth. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 15 (3), 71–82. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150308
18.
18. Khukhlaev, O. E., Gritsenko, V. V., Pavlova, O. S. et al. (2020b). Author’s Model of Intercultural Competence: Mechanisms for Forming Intercultural Effectivenes. Social and Psychological Problems of Modern Society and People: Solutions (pp. 37–40). Vitebsk: Vitebsk State University Publishing House. (In Russian).