Authors
- Ravochkin Nikita Nikolaevich Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Doctor of Philosophical Sciences
Annotation
The development of the problematic of comprehending the genesis, as well as the subsequent development of ideas produced by intellectuals, is relatively new for modern philosophy. The relevance of understanding the functioning of ideas in time and space is also coupled with the logic of the study of all philosophical thought. Moreover, today ideas are gradually returning the status of a material force for the implementation of certain social transformations. Operationalization of ideas is associated with comprehending the vectors of intellectual search and building a clear picture that captures the discourses prevailing at certain time periods. One of the most important contradictions of the present is the insufficient elaboration of the sections of the ideological-oriented search against the background of increasing
general expectations from the results of the activities of intellectuals for the evolutionary practices of modern society. In order to reveal the stated topic, the author’s position is based on the comparative analysis and theoretical and methodological approach of R. Collins, which considers communication between intellectuals through networks. In addition, the author turns to methods of analytical reconstruction, reviews and critical assessments. This article is devoted to the analysis of a case designed to reveal the peculiarities of communication between intellectuals and to show the development of specific research through the interaction and polemics of some factions with others. The essential characteristics of networks are presented. The issues of continuity between generations of participants in intellectual associations are highlighted. The article provides a description of the research of representatives of the Cambridge School, who tried to build a practice-oriented social philosophy and focused on the study of liberalism and democratic societies. The article shows in detail the polemic of M. Oakeshott, conducted with the Cambridge citizens, who considered the political from a pronounced conservative position. In conclusion, theses on the relevance of Oakeshott’s ideas are presented and an opinion is expressed about their subsequent development in various discourses.
How to link insert
Ravochkin, N. N. (2021). Ideas Genesis in Communication Processes Between Intellectuals (Case of M. Oakshott and Cambridge School Polemic) Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2021, №4 (40), 48. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2021.40.4.04
References
1.
1. Bondarenko, D. M., Kowalewski, S. A., & Small, D. B. (2020) The Evolution of Social Institutions: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51437-2
2.
2. Bouz, D. (2004). Libertarianstvo. Istoriia, printsipy, politika [Libertarianism. History, principles, politics]. Chelyabinsk: Socium. [in Russian].
3.
3. Collins, R. (2002). The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
4.
4. El-Den, J., & Sriratanaviriyakul, N. (2019). The Role of Opinions and Ideas as Types of Tacit Knowledge. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.095
5.
5. Chamaeva, N. A. (2005). Konservatizm v politicheskoj filosofii Majkla Oukshotta [Conservatism in the political philosophy of Michael Oakshott]. Moscow University Bulletin. 12: Political Science, 5, 97–101. [in Russian].
6.
6. Markey-Towler, B. (2018). The competition and evolution of ideas in the public sphere: a new foundation for institutional theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15 (1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137418000061
7.
7. Moore, B. N., & Bruder, K. (2019). Philosophy: The Power of Ideas. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
8.
8. Moravcsik, A. (2018). Preferences, Power and Institutions in 21st century Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56, 7, 1648–1674. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12804
9.
9. Mouzakitis, A. (2017) Modernity and the idea of progress. Frontiers of Sociology, 2, article 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2017.00003
10.
10. Oukshott, M. (2009). Sovremennye predstavleniia o politicheskom gospodstve [Modern views of political domination]. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12: Political Science, 1, 73–81. [in Russian].
11.
11. Oukshott, M. (2002). Chto znachit byt` konservatorom [What it means to be a conservative]. In Ratsionalizm v politike i drugie stat`i [Rationalism in politics and other articles]. M.: Idea-press. 288. [in Russian].
12.
12. Petralia, D. (2020). Free circulation of ideas as a means of communication in a political democracy. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (2), 2890–2893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.435
13.
13. Ravochkin, N. N. (2018). Libertarianstvo: rassmotrenie s pozitsii analiticheskoi politicheskoi filosofii [Libertarianism: Considered from the Position of Analytical Political Philosophy]. Discourse, 6, 3–10. [in Russian].
14.
14. Ravochkin, N. N. (2020). Politicheskaia filosofiia Kembridzhskoi shkoly i analiticheskaia filosofiia [Cambridge School Political Philosophy and Analytical Philosophy]. Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Philosophy, 2 (52), 293–304. [in Russian].
15.
15. Ratner-Rosenhagen, J. (2019). The Ideas That Made America: A Brief History. New York: Oxford University Press. 152.
16.
16. Ravochkin, N. N. (2019a). Political Ideas Discourse In Network Society: Socio-Philosophical Analysis. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, LXXVI, 2657–2663. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.04.357
17.
17. Ravochkin, N. N. (2019b). Role of philosophical ideas for political and legal institutions. In Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Practical Conference «The Individual and Society in the Modern Geopolitical Environment», 331, 596–600. https://doi.org/10.2991/ismge-19.2019.113
18.
18. Shevchuk, I. I. (2017). About the ration of category of social dynamics. Caspian region: politics, economics, culture, 2 (51), 177–186.
19.
19. Teraji, S. (2018). The Cognitive Basis of Institutions: A Synthesis of Behavioral and Institutional Economics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press.
20.
20. Vossen E., & Gestel, van N. (2019). Translating macro-ideas into micro-level practices: The role of social interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35, 1, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.12.001
21.
21. Waddock, S. (2018). Narrative, Memes, and the Prospect of Large Systems Change. Humanistic Management Journal, 3 (1), 17–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-018-0039-9
22.
22. Zapuskalov, A. M. (2014). Konservatizm Maikla Oukshotta v sovremennykh zarubezhnykh issledovaniiakh [Michael Oakeshott’s Conservatism in Contemporary Foreign Studies]. Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice, 6-2 (44), 78–81. [in Russian].