Home → Releases → № 2 (58) →

SEMIOTIC ASPECTS OF TRUST AS A FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENT OF CULTURE

Social and Political Philosophy , UDC: 130.2 DOI: 10.24412/2078-9238-2026-258-9-23

Authors

  • Marchenko Anastasiya Yu. PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor Russian Federation Volgograd
  • Saenko Natalya R. Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor Russian Federation Moscow

Annotation

The article considers the semiotics of trust as the most important cultural and anthropological phenomenon. Interpersonal trust is understood as a basic element of subjective existence and a condition of social solidarity, the importance of which is proportional to the instability and riskiness of social interactions. In turn, culture, considered as a complex dynamic semantic-generating integrity, through a system of signs and rituals materializes an intangible sense of trust, translating it into concrete, observable forms of social interaction.
Tags:
Identity , Philosophy of culture. , semiotics and phenomenology of trust , Solidarity , suspicion , symbolism

How to link insert

Marchenko, A. Y. & Saenko, N. R. (2026). SEMIOTIC ASPECTS OF TRUST AS A FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENT OF CULTURE Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 2 (58), 9. https://doi.org/10.24412/2078-9238-2026-258-9-23
References
1. 1 Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power: two works. Wiley.
2. 2. Kierkegaard, S. (1993). Fear and trepidation (N. V. Isaeva, & S. A. Isaev, Trans.). Respublika. (In Russian).
3. 3. Heidegger, M. (2003). Genesis and time (V. V. Bibikhin, Trans.). Folio. (In Russian).
4. 4. Averintsev, S.S. (2023). The Word of God and the word of man. Roman speeches. Nikea. (In Russian).
5. 5. Pigalev, A. I. (2008). Reality management and culture as an environment of solidarity. In A. I. Makarov, & Yu. Yu. Vetyutnev, Ed. Sredy. Essays on the theory of solidarity (рр. 13–28). Volgograd Scientific Publishing House. (In Russian).
6. 6. Hobbes, T. (1989). Works in 2 vols. (V. V. Sokolov, Comp.; N. Fedorov, & A. Guterman, Trans.; vol. 1). Mysl. (In Russian).
7. 7. Hobsbawm, E. (2000). The invention of traditions. Bulletin of Eurasia, (1 (8)), 47–62. (In Russian).
8. 8. Shklovsky, B. V. (1983). On the theory of prose. Soviet writer. (In Russian).
9. 9. Ericson, E. H. (1993). Identity youth and crisis. W. W. Norton.
10. 10. Sivkov, D. Y. (2008). Immune boundaries of the environment. In A. I. Makarov, & Yu. Yu. Vetyutnev, Ed. Sredy. Essays on the theory of solidarity (рр. 29–42). Volgograd Scientific Publishing House. (In Russian).
11. 11. Pigalev, A. I. (2022). Semiotic aspects of the history of the concept of energy in philosophy. Logos et Texts, 21, (3), 6–16. (In Russian).
12. 12. Tsokur, Е. Е., Repina, M. G., Saenko N. R., & Grigoryev S. L. (2022). Legal status of fake news: global challenges and possible solutions. Relacoes Internacionais no Mundo Atual, 2, (34), 60–73.
13. 13. Shtompka, P. (2006). Trust in the era of globalization. Social policy and sociology, (4), 8–15. (In Russian).
14. 14. Fukuyama, F. (2004). Trust: social virtues and the path to prosperity (D. Pavlova, V. Kiryushchenko, & М. Kolopotin, Trans.). AST, Ermak. (In Russian).
15. 15. Kortunov, V. V., & Saenko, N. R. (2022). Emotional antinomies of modernity. Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Man, 11, (№ 5-1), 83–91. (In Russian).
16. 16. Kirzyuk, A. A., & Arkhipova, A. S. (2023). “Wash” and “put down”: Soviet rituals of redistribution of goods. Monitoring Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (2), 327–349. (In Russian).
17. 17. Gudkov, L. D. (2004). Negative identity. Articles from 1997 to 2002. New Literary Review; VTSIOM-A. (In Russian).
18. 18. Propp, V. Ya. (2000). Historical roots of a fairy tale (I. V. Peshkov, Ed.). Labyrinth. (In Russian).
19. 19. Nussbaum, M. (1986). The fragility of goodness: luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Download file .pdf 388.26 kb