Authors
- Korchazhkina Olga M. Candidate of Technical Sciences
Annotation
The article focuses on the results of research on the problem of gaining new knowledge carried out by representatives of various philosophical trends and scientific
schools, through the correlation of the categories of thinking and being, or the essence and the entity. Plato analyzes the dichotomy of the intelligible and the contemplative, the dichotomy for S. Rubinstein is the being and the seeming, and it is theoretical propositions and propositions of observations for W. Quine. M. Mamardashvili conducts his reasoning in terms of the topoi of thought and the bodies of understanding. More traditional dichotomies are used by V. Stepin, which are artificial and natural cognitive processes. Fundamentally different approaches, based on identifying and resolving contradictions when verifying the objectivity of scientific knowledge, are demonstrated by K. Popper and G. Priest. Popper, in search of a solution to the induction problem identified by D. Hume, rejects inductive logic and the verifiability of scientific theory, recognizing falsifiability through the deductive method as the only way to support it, while Priest thinks in global categories of dialetheism, weaving the concepts of the internal and external loci in relation to totality into the doctrine of the limits of thought.
How to link insert
Korchazhkina, O. M. (2025). UNDERSTANDING THE NATURE OF THE REALITY THROUGH THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ESSENCE AND THE ENTITY Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 4 (56), 44. https://doi.org/10.24412/2078-9238-2025-456-44-62
References
1.
1. Quine, U. V. O. (2010). From a logical point of view. 9 logico-philosophical essays (V. A. Ladov, & V. A. Surovtsev, Trans.; V. A. Surovtsev, Ed.). Canon +; Rehabilitation. (Original work published in 1953). (In Russian).
2.
2. Plato (2023). The state, or About justice. In Plato. Complete works in one volume (pp. 748–970). ALPHA-KNIGA. (In Russian).
3.
3. Plato (2023). Theaetetus, or On knowledge. In Plato. Complete works in one volume (pp. 129–181). ALPHA-KNIGA. (In Russian).
4.
4. Skvortsov, N. E. (2020). Plato on knowledge in the struggle against sensationalism and rational empiricism: An analysis of the Theaetetus dialogue. Librocom. (In Russian).
5.
5. Quine, U. V. O. (2014). Pursuit of truth. (V. A. Surovtsev, & N. A. Tarabanov, Trans.; V. A. Surovtsev, Ed.). Canon +; Rehabilitation. (Original work published in 1990). (In Russian).
6.
6. Quine, U. V. O. (2008). Philosophy of logic (V. A. Surovtsev, Trans.). Canon+; Rehabilitation. (Original work published in 1970).. (In Russian).
7.
7. Sadovsky, V. N. (2002). Karl Popper and Russia. Editorial URSS. (In Russian).
8.
8. Popper, K. R. (1983). The logic and the growth of scientific knowledge. Selected works (L. V. Blinnikov, V. N. Bryushinkin, E. L. Nappelbaum, & A. L. Nikiforov, Trans.; V. N. Sadovsky, Ed.). Progress. (In Russian).
9.
9. Popper, K. R. (2004). The logic of scientific discovery (D. G. Lahuti, Trans.; V. N. Sadovsky, Ed.). Editorial URSS. (In Russian).
10.
10. Rubinstein, S. L. (2012). The man and the world. Piter. (In Russian).
11.
11. Mamardashvili, M. K. (2019). Arrow of knowledge. Merab Mamardashvili Foundation. (In Russian).
12.
12. Stepin, V. S. (2009). Classics, non-classics, post-non-classics: Criteria of distinction. In Kiyashchenko, L. P., & Stepin V. S. (Eds.). Post-non-classics: philosophy, science, culture: A monograph (pp. 249–295). Mir. (In Russian).
13.
13. Stepin, V. S., & Kuznetsova, L. F. (1994). The scientific picture of the world in the culture of a technogenic civilization. IFRAN. (In Russian).
14.
14. Priest, G. (2024). Beyond the limits of thought (V. V. Tselishchev, Trans.). Canon+; Rehabilitation. (In Russian).