Authors
- Stozhko Dmitrii Konstantinovich Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor
- Stozhko Konstantin Petrovich Doctor of Historical Sciences
Annotation
The relevance of the socio-philosophical study of the phenomenon of the “new reality” is due to the formation of a multipolar world, the transformation of value systems and social relations in the context of a geopolitical crisis and the transition to a new technological order. The aim of the study is to assess the existing in modern science ideas about the “new reality” and its socio-philosophical and anthropological understanding. The study used the methods of induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, hermeneutics, structural and functional analysis. The object of the study is the essence, structure and content of the new reality, the subject of the study is the process of formation and deployment
of the new reality in modern conditions. As a result of the study, a comprehensive analysis of the ongoing discussion in modern science about the essence and nature of the new reality is given. Two (centrifugal and centripetal) main trends in its formation and development are revealed. The toxicity (phenomenon of dehumanization) of the processes of formation of the new reality in the conditions of growing turbulence and aggravating global geopolitical crisis is shown, and also the frontier character of formation of the “new man” is caused by the current “clash of civilizations”. The model of abuse is identified and considered – social relations in which instead of partners there is a “new” social regulator
“aggressor – victim”. As an introduction, the provisions on the need for a substantive and consistent study of the relationship between the phenomenon of the new reality and scien tific and technological progress, as well as the study of this narrative in the system of modern education for the purpose of ideological and professional training of future
specialists for the new conditions of implementation of economic activity in the system of transforming social relations are formulated.
How to link insert
Stozhko, D. K. & Stozhko, K. P. (2025). NEW REALITY: SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL DIMENSION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 2 (54), 7. https://doi.org/10.24412/2078-9238-2025-254-7-21
References
1.
1. Kleinenberg, E. (2014). Going solo. New social reality. Alpina-non-fiction. (In Russian).
2.
2. Searle, J. (2004). Rationality in action. Progress-Tradition. (In Russian).
3.
3. Beck, U. (2000). Risk society. Towards another modernity. Progress-Tradition. (In Russian).
4.
4. Debord, G. (2022). Society of the spectacle. AST. (In Russian).
5.
5. Foucaul, M. (2019). Supervise and the punish. The birth of prison. Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).
6.
6. Derrida, J. (2004). Globalization. World. Cosmopolitanism. Cosmopolis, 2 (8), 125–140. (In Russian).
7.
7. Camus, A. (2023). Rebellious man. The myth of Sisyphus. AST. (In Russian).
8.
8. Izhboldin, V. A. (2011). Genesis of the concept of information society. Sociology of Power, 5, 105–110. (In Russian).
9.
9. Webster, F. (2004). Theories of the information society. Aspect-Press. (In Russian).
10.
10. Baudrillard, J. (2023). Consumer society. AST. (In Russian).
11.
11. Toffler, E. (1999). The third wave. AST. (In Russian).
12.
12. Castells, M. (2004). Informationalism, networks, and the network society: a theoretical blueprint. In M. Castells (Ed.), The network society: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 3–49). Edward Elgar.
13.
13. Naisbitt, J. (2003). Megatrends. AST. (In Russian).
14.
14. Frolov, I. T. (1983). Human Prospects. An Experience of a comprehensive problem statement, discussion, and generalization. Politizdat. (In Russian).
15.
15. Khiluta, V. N. (2022). Human and the new reality: What will be the choice? Philosophy of Law, 4 (103), 94–99. (In Russian).
16.
16. Shcheglov, A. P. (2016). Soviet man — a social construct or a biological type? Questions of Nationalism, 4 (28), 143–156. (In Russian).
17.
17. Marcuse, G. (1994). One-dimensional man. A study of the ideology of the developed industrial society. REFL-book. (In Russian).
18.
18. Mounier, E. (1999). Manifesto of personalism. Republic. (In Russian).
19.
19. Fromm, E. (2011). To Have or to Be? AST. (In Russian).
20.
20. Pekelis, M. A., & Antipov, S. S. (2017). The old philosophy and a new reality. Philosophical school, 1, 22–31. (In Russian).
21.
21. Osipov, G. V., Karepova, S. G., & Klimovitsky, S. V. (2014). New social reality as an object of social construction. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 6, 246–258. (In Russian).
22.
22. Fukuyama, F. (2015). The end of history and the last man. AST. (In Russian).
23.
23. Ilyin, I. (1998). The path to obviousness. Eksmo-Press. (In Russian).
24.
24. John, Metropolitan. (2012). Autocracy of the spirit: Essays on Russian self-conscious ness. Algorithm. (In Russian).
25.
25. Andryukhina, L. M. (2016). Philosophy of the New Reality: from Telepresence to Telebeing. In A. V. Loginov, & O. N. Tomuk (Eds.), Philosophy in the 21 st century: Challen ges, values, prospects (pp. 59–64). Max-Info. (In Russian).
26.
26. Rudnev, V. (2016). New model of reality. HSE. (In Russian).