Home Releases 2022, №4 (44)

ADAPTATION OF AGILE METHODOLOGIES FOR REMOTE WORK IN THE IT INDUSTRY AND PROJECT-BASED E-LEARNING EDUCATION DURING THE PANDEMIC

The History of Ideas and Modernity , UDC: 378.147 DOI: 10.25688/2078-9238.2022.44.4.6

Authors

  • Mukhin Dmitry Nikolayevich Candidate of Biological Sciences (Ph. D.)
  • Zmazneva Olesya Anatolievna Candidate of Philological Sciences (Ph. D.), Associate Professor

Annotation

Under the COVID-19 pandemic, the IT industry and higher education abruptly shifted from conventional in-office to remote work and distant learning. For professional agile IT teams, this rapid turn has not been as difficult as for higher education with its traditional offline formats. The main challenge of remote work has been overcoming the lack of face-to-face interaction to effectively communicate, collaborate, motivate, inform, and make presentations. Using advances in communication technology, the IT industry has successfully adapted the Agile processes to stay productive in the remote-work environment. One of the main tasks of higher engineering education is to teach students practical skills to help them integrate into the industry. Before the pandemic, the Moscow Polytechnical University introduced several new practice-oriented IT programs to prepare students with practical skills of project teamwork based on agile principles. The pandemic presented some program challenges because education has switched to distance e-learning. This paper describes how IT students and educators in the IT Department at the Moscow Polytechnical University adapted Agile practices for distant e-learning and remote teamwork on the assigned projects. It compares it to how the US professional IT teams modified Agile methods to fit their remote work.

How to link insert

Mukhin, D. N. & Zmazneva, O. A. (2022). ADAPTATION OF AGILE METHODOLOGIES FOR REMOTE WORK IN THE IT INDUSTRY AND PROJECT-BASED E-LEARNING EDUCATION DURING THE PANDEMIC Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №4 (44), 68. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2022.44.4.6
References
1. 1. Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS. Quarterly, 19 (2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
2. 2. Dietz-Uhler, B., Fisher, A. & and Han, A. (2007). Designing online courses to promote student retention. J. Educ. Technol. Syst., 36, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.36.1.g
3. 3. Hayashi, A., Chen, C., Ryan, T., & Wu, J. (2004). The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15 (2), 139–154.
4. 4. Kachestvo obrazovaniya (2016), 9, 26–29.
5. 5. Umek, L., Aristovnik, A., Tomaževič, N. & Keržič, D. (2015). Analysis of selected aspects of students’ performance and satisfaction in a Moodle-based E-Learning system environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11 (6), 1495–1505.
6. 6. Crede, M. & Philips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 337–346.
7. 7. Pereira, F., Ramos, A., Paula, Adreade, A. & Oliveira, B. (2015). Continued usage of e-learning: Expectations and performance. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 12. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752015000200008.
8. 8. Topchyan, R. (2016). Does social presence relate to knowledge sharing in virtual learning teams? Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 8 (4), 646–660.
9. 9. Zmazneva, O. A. (2016). Govorit’, chtoby pobedit’. Kachestvo obrazovaniya, 9, 26–29 (In Russian). Retriever from http://agilemanifesto.org/
Download file .pdf 320.38 kb