Home → Releases → 2019, №1 (29) →

The Experience of the Axiomatic Construction of the Theory of Cognition

Theory of Knowledge , UDC: 165 DOI: 10.25688/2078-9238.2019.29.1.04

Authors

  • Djidjian Robert Zalibekovich Doctor of Philosophy, full professor, professor of the department of Philosophy and Logic, Hachatur Abovyan Armenian State Teacher Training University. E-mail: jijyanrobert25@aspu.am
  • Hovhannisyan Hasmik Оganesovna Doctor of Philosophy, associate professor, professor of the department of Philosophy and Logic, Hachatur Abovyan Armenian State Teacher Training University. E-mail: hashovhannisyan@hotmail.com
Tags:
Axiomatic method , Epistemology , Methodology of scientific investigation , Theory of cognition

How to link insert

Djidjian, R. Z. & Hovhannisyan, H. О. (2019). The Experience of the Axiomatic Construction of the Theory of Cognition Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2019, №1 (29), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2019.29.1.04
References
1. Aristotel'. Metafizika // Soch.: v 4 t. M.: My'sl', 1976. T. 1. S. 63-367.
2. Be'kon F. Novy'j Organon // Soch.: v 2 t. M.: My'sl', 1978. T. 2. S. 5-214.
3. Dzhidzhyan R. Metodologicheskij analiz processa otkry'tij i izobretenij. Erevan: Izd-vo Erevansk. gos. un-ta, 1982. 280 s.
4. Dzhidzhyan R. Obshhaya xarakteristika logiki nauchnogo issledovaniya // Meto­dologicheskij analiz genezisa nauchnoj teorii / K. Oganyan [i dr.]. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGE'U,
5. S. 282-299.
6. Kun T. Struktura nauchny'x revolyucij: per. s angl. M.: ACT, 2003. 605 s.
7. Lejbnicz G.V. Novy'e opy'ty' o chelovecheskom razume. M.; L.: Gospolitizdat,
8. 581 s.
9. Mill'Dzh.S. Sistema logiki sillogisticheskoj i induktivnoj. 2-e izd. M.: G.A. Leman,
10. 880 s.
11. Oganesyan A. Erevanskaya shkola argumentacii // Metodologicheskij analiz genezisa nauchnoj teorii / K. Oganyan [i dr.]. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGE'U, 2018. S. 243-281.
12. Oganesyan A., Dzhidzhyan R. Aksiomatizaciya gumanitarny'x nauk — imperativ e'poxi cifrovy'x texnologij // Vestnik MGPU. Ser. «Filosofskie nauki». 2018. № 3 (27).
13. S. 46-57.
14. PopovichM.V. O filosofskom analize yazy'ka nauki. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1966.
15. 224 s.
16. Djidjan R. Building the logic of scientific thinking // Main Issues of Pedagogy and Psychology. 2011. № 3. P. 164-173.
17. Djidjian R. Getting Ready for Great Discoveries. Yerevan: Yerevan state university
18. publ. house, 2004.
19. Hershel J. A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy. London: Longman & Green, 1851. 372 p.
20. Hovhannisyan H. Meta-Argumentation from the Perspective of Metaphilosophy // News and Views. Vol. 4. No 1 (31). 2012 International Academy for Philosophy Press, Yerevan (Armenia) - Athens (Greece) - Berkeley (USA), P. 47.
21. Hovhannisyan H. Meta-Argumentation as an Argumentation Meta-theory // Metaphilosophy / edited by Armen T. Marsoobian. July 2015. USA, P. 479-487.
22. Hovhannisyan H., Djidjian R. Building a General Theory of Me-ta-Argumentation //
23. Metaphilosophy / edited by Armen T. Marsoobian. April 2017. USA. P. 345-354.
24. Hovhannisyan H. Problems of Argumentation in Medieval Armenian Philosophy // Wisdom: Scientific Periodical. 2017. № 1 (8). R. 81-94.
25. Hovhannisyan H. Argumentation Issues in the Context of the History of Armenian Philosophical Thought. Book 1. Three Outlines: Yeznik Koghbatsi, David Anhaght, Grigor Tatevatsi. Publishing House of the National Academy of Sciences of RA. Yerevan, 2005.
26. Lakatos I., Musgrave A. (eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. 282 p.
27. Whewell W. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. Founded Upon Their History. Vol. 1. Parker, 1840. 708 p.
Download file .pdf 290.17 kb