Home → Releases → 2018, №4 (28) →

On the Problem of Finding the Meaning of the Concept «City» (the Representation of Some Modern Concepts)

Research of Young Scientists’ Research , UDC: 130.2 DOI: 10.25688/2078-9238.2018.28.4.11

Authors

  • Prokhodskaya Margarita Aleksandrovna A postgraduate student of the alluniversity department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Moscow City University. E-mail: azhuk1@mail.ru

Annotation

The article touches upon the problem of understanding, interpreting and constructing the meaning of the term «city». Taking into account the action of various factors and constant transformations inherent in the phenomenon of the city, the importance of understanding its context is emphasized
Tags:
City , Concept , Interpretation , Meaning , Transformation

How to link insert

Prokhodskaya, M. A. (2018). On the Problem of Finding the Meaning of the Concept «City» (the Representation of Some Modern Concepts) Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2018, №4 (28), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2018.28.4.11
References
1. Berking X. Gorod, kak lyudej, uznaesh' po poxodke: nabroski ob izuchenii goroda i gorodov // Sobstvennaya logika gorodov. M.: NLO, 2017. 424 s.
2. Berking X., Lev M. Vvedenie // Sobstvennaya logika gorodov: Novy'e podxody' k urbanistike. M.: NLO, 2017. 424 s.
3. Dil'tej V. Struktura istoricheskogo mira v naukax o duxe // per. po izd-yu: Dilthey W. Gesammelte Schriften. VII. Bd. Stuttgart, Gottingen. 1992. S. 228-246.
4. Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPB, 2010. 704 s.
5. Filippov A.F. Sociologia: nablyudeniya, opy'ty', perspektivy' / pod obshh. red. S.P. Ban'kovskoj. SPb.: Vladimir Dal', 2014. T. 1. 552 s.
6. Frege G. Smy'sl i denotat. Semiotika i informatika. Vy'p. 8. M.: VINITI, 1997. S.154-155.
7. Hasse Yu. «Gorod» — plavayushhij termin // Sobstvennaya logika gorodov: Novy'e podxody' k urbanistike. M.: NLO, 2017. 424 s.
8. E'ko U. Otsutstvuyushhaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu / per. s ital. V.G. Reznik i A.G. Pogonyajlo. SPb.: Simpozium, 2006. 544 s.
9. Bell A. Daniel, Avner de-Shalit. The Spirit of Cities. Why the Identity of a City Matters in a Global Age. Princeton University Press, 2011. 360 р.
10. Donald J. Imagining the Modern City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999. 18 р.
11. Donald James. Metropolis: The City as Text. In Social and Cultural Forms of Modernity, eds. Robert Bcock and Kenneth Thompson, 417-61. Cambridge: Polity Pres in association with Basil Blackwell and The Open University. 1992. 422 р.
12. Giandomenico A. La ипа postmoderna. Rome and Bari: Laterza, 1997. 272 р.
13. Halapsis A. Urbis et Orbis: Non-Euclidean Space of History. Evropsky filozoficky a historicky diskurz 1 (2). 2015. P. 37-42.
14. Magoroh M. Mindscapes and Science Theories. In Current Anthropology 21. 1980. P. 589-608.
15. Raban J. Soft City. Glasgow: Fontana (first published in 1974 by Hamish Hamilton, London). 1975. 10 р.
16. Soja Edward W. Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions, Blackwell 2000. 12 р.
17. Silva A. Urban Imaginaries from Latin America. Documenta 1. Kassel: Hatje Cantz Publishers, 2003. 320 р.
18. Strauss A. Some Varieties of American Urban Symbolism. In An American City. A Sourcebook of Urban Imagery, ed. Anselm Strauss, 19-35. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1968. 24 р.
19. Taylor P.J., Lang R.E. The shock other new: 100 concepts describing recent urban change // Environment and Planning. 2004. P. 951-958.
20. Wachsmuth D. City as ideology: reconciling the explosion of the city form with the tenacity of the city concept // Environment and Planning. D: Society and Space. 2014. № 32. P. 75-90.
Download file .pdf 274.97 kb