Home Releases № 3 (51)

THE PRINCIPLES OF PURE REASON IN THE WORK OF I. KANT “CRITICISM OF PURE REASON”

The History of Ideas and Modernity , UDC: 1(165) DOI: 10.25688/2078-9238.2024.51.3.6

Authors

  • Kucherenko Alexander V. Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor

Annotation

The Critique of Pure Reason is a significant milestone in the history of the development of philosophical thought, revealing the deep foundations of the process of cognition, indicating the presence in them of a priori forms of sensuality and reason that enter into certain relationships with each other. The focus of this study is on the basic properties of pure reason, related through the categories of reason to a priori sensuality. In thinking about the totality of the signs of pure reason, architectonics comes to the fore as the ability to create a system based on the principle of subordination of secondary values to the main one with the establishment of a causal relationship between them. The work reveals the farambiguous relationship between pure reason and the categories of reason, which, on the one hand, retain their originality, and on the other have the ability to interpenetrate, which is quite clearly demonstrated by such a category as “totality”, which is simultaneously part of the totality of the principles of reason. Pure reason, as follows from the logic and practice of its use, is subject to negative influence from the outside, but at the same time has a number of conditions in itself that make it impossible for it to create reliable representations. The work notes that pure reason contains laws that it cannot evade, but at the same time has freedom.

How to link insert

Kucherenko, A. V. (2024). THE PRINCIPLES OF PURE REASON IN THE WORK OF I. KANT “CRITICISM OF PURE REASON” Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 3 (51), 71. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2024.51.3.6
References
1. 1. Hajdegger, M. (1997). Kant and the problem of metaphysics. Moscow: Logos. 227. (In Russian).
2. 2. Asmus, V. F. (1973). Immanuel Kant. Moscow: Nauka. 539. (In Russian).
3. 3. Ojzerman, T. I. (2008). Kant and Hegel (comparative research experience). Moscow: Kanon+; Reabilitaciya. 520. (In Russian).
4. 4. Gulyga, A. V. (2001). German Classical Philosophy. Moscow: Rol’f. 416. (In Russian).
5. 5. Kant, I. (1964). Criticism of pure reason. 6 (3). Moscow: Mysl, 800. (In Russian).
6. 6. Fikara, E. (2023). Transcendental deduction of categories as a philosophical proof. Kantovskij sbornik, 42 (3). Kaliningrad: RGU imeni I. Kanta. 74–96. (In Russian).
7. 7. Zenzen, O. (2023). Why study Kant? Problem statement. Kantovskij sbornik, 42 (2). Kaliningrad: RGU imeni I. Kanta. 7–15. (In Russian).
8. 8. The International Kant Congress has ended in Kaliningrad. Retrieved from https://rg.ru/2024/04/26/reg-szfo/v-kaliningrade-zavershilsia-mezhdunarodnyj-kantovskij-kongress.html (In Russian).
Download file .pdf 333.11 kb