Authors
- Kucherenko Alexander V. Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor
Annotation
The article deals with the problem of finding points of intersection of the methodologies of formal, dialectical logic and transcendental methodology of I. Kant within the framework of his subjective idealism. This approach is conditioned by the need to overcome the idea of their disunity and exceptional independence. Within the framework of the concept of interpenetration of methodologies, not only their isolation within their own borders is destroyed, but also the condition under which each of them serves as the basis for the possibility of the existence of the other two is revealed. The conducted research includes fixing the stable structure of the methods as completely independent values, which at the same time does not exclude the possibility of their combination with each other in various ways. The position is defended,
according to which, despite the specifics of the methods, they should be united by a common basis not only for the very possibility of existence, but also for complementarity. The article raises the question of the reason that can generate and consolidate in consciousness a priori forms that ensure the process of formation of experimental knowledge.
How to link insert
Kucherenko, A. V. (2023). THE RELATIONSHIP OF FORMAL, DIALECTICAL AND TRANSCENDENTAL METHODOLOGIES I. KANT Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2023, №3 (47), 38. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2023.47.3.3
References
1.
1. Hegel, G. V. F. (1997). Nauka logiki. Kniga 3. Uchenie o ponyatii [The science of logic. 3d book. The Doctrine of the concept]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 800 p. P. 525–772. (In Russian).
2.
2. Descartes, R. Rassuzhdenie o metode, chtoby verno napravliat’ svoi razum i otyskivat’ istinu v naukakh [Reasoning about the method to guide your mind correctly and find the truth in the sciences]. Humanitarian portal. (In Russian). Retrieved from https://gtmarket. ru/library/basis/3698#t2
3.
3. Kant, I. (1994). Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniia. Sochineniya: v 8 t. [Criticism of the ability of judgment. Works in 8 volumes]. Vol. 5. Moscow: Choro. 414 p. (In Russian).
4.
4. Kant, I. (1964). Kritika chistogo razuma. Sochineniya: v 6 t. [Critique of pure reason. Works in 6 volumes]. Vol. 3. Moscow: Mysl. 800 p. (In Russian).
5.
5. Kant, I. (2006). Logika. Posobie k lektsiiam. Traktaty [Logic. Manual for lectures. Treatises]. St. Petersburg: Nauka. P. 425–534. (In Russian).
6.
6. Lenin, V. I. (1978). Filosofskie tetradi [Philosophical notebooks]. Moscow: Politizdat. 752 p. (In Russian).
7.
7. Malkina, S. M. (2021). Ot transtsendentalizma Kanta k idealizmu Fikhte [From Kant’s transcendentalism to Fichte’s idealism]. Society: philosophy, history, culture, 12, 30–35. (In Russian).
8.
8. Semenov, V. E. (2008). Transtsendental’nye osnovy ponimaniia (I. Kant i neokantianstvo) [Transcendental foundations of understanding (I. Kant and Neo-Kantianism)]. Vladimir: Publishing House of the Vladimir State University. 228 p. (In Russian).
9.
9. Tetyuyev, L. I. (2017). Transtsendental’nye osnovy ponimaniia (I. Kant i neokantianstvo) [Transcendentalism in the theory of knowledge: I. Kant and neo-Kantianism. Gramota, 10 (1), 167–170. (In Russian).
10.
10. Cherezov, A. E. (2022). Priroda dukha v filosofii Gegelia [The Nature of Spirit in Hegel’s Philosophy]. MCU Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 1 (41), 47–56. (In Russian).