Authors
- Kozhevnikova Margarita Nikolaevna Candidate of Philosophical Sciences
Annotation
The concept of the project in the XX century entered the culture, into the wide spheres of theoretical thought and practice, in particular, in pedagogy and education,
therefore, the phenomenon of the project, with its relevance, requires a more detailed understanding. In particular, this concerns the problem of correlating aesthetic (in the sense of sensual) and ethical dimensions in the project, since, with the growth of activism in modern life, the lack of clarity of this problem leads to increasingly tangible consequences for man and humanity, manifesting an immature state of mass consciousness (“people-children”) in a catastrophic — actions for the world.
The presented study, in which the phenomenon of the project is analyzed within the framework of the theory of subjectivity anthropology developed by the author as one
of the central ones for the experience of the adult human (Homo edultus), reveals the nature of this phenomenon, coming from relationships with another/Others; its causes; its difference from projection as a phenomenon inherent in immature consciousness — and thus, due to the identified special characteristics, is the next step in the development of the understanding of the project, compared with past interpretations (Heidegger, Sartre, Dewey, Arendt). In connection with the nature of the project, the unity of aesthetic and ethical dimensions embodied in it was revealed, despite the well-known inconsistency of these categories, analyzed by Kierkegaard and Huebner, achieved through the combination in its genesis of vital meaning serving the happiness of the person himself, and excess of others representing the side of the world. In solving the problem of contradiction, it is proposed to clarify the very essence of the ethical, which is defined by the social dimension, but is not identical to it, manifested to the maximum extent in the ethics of altruism. The ethical dimension is able to resist the social in projects in the conditions of an aggressive society of a totalitarian society.
How to link insert
Kozhevnikova, M. N. (2022). THE PHENOMENON OF THE PROJECT IN A PERSON’S LIFE IS THE MEETING OF THE AESTHETIC (SENSUAL) AND ETHICAL CHANGES Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №4 (44), 20. https://doi.org/10.25688/2078-9238.2022.44.4.2
References
1.
1. Arendt, H. (2000). The Vita Activa and the Modern Age. Saint Petersburg: Aletejja. 630 p. (In Russian).
2.
2. Deljoz, Zh. (1997). The Fold. Leibniz and the Baroque. Moscow: Logos. 264 p. (In Russian).
3.
3. Dostoevskij, F. M. (1988). Collected works in 15 volumes. Vol. 6. Leningrad: Nauka. 669 p. (In Russian).
4.
4. Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. Boston: D. C. Heath. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/howwethink000838mb (2022, September, 2).
5.
5. Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath. 301 p.
6.
6. Frankl, V. (1997). Man`s Search for Meaning. Moscow: Progress. 368 p. (In Russian).
7.
7. Gegel`, G. V. F. (2000). The Phenomenology of Spirit (translated from German by G. G. Shpet). Moscow: Science. 495 p. (In Russian).
8.
8. Gelen, A. (1988). About the systematics of anthropology. Problem of man in western philosophy (compilation and afterword by P. S. Gurevich; under the general editorship of Yu. N. Popov). Moscow: Progress. 163 p. (In Russian).
9.
9. Gricanov, A. A. (2007). The Fold. The latest philosophical dictionary. Postmodernism (chief scientific editor and compiler A. A. Gritsanov; pp. 229–231). Minsk: Modern writer. Re-trieved from https://royallib.com/read/gritsanov_aleksandr/noveyshiy_filosofskiy_slovar_postmodernizm.html#4669440 (2021, October, 1). (In Russian).
10.
10. Hajdegger, M. (1997). Being and Time. Moscow: Ad Marginem. 503. (In Russian).
11.
11. Hjubner, B. (1996). Random Ethos and Enforcement of Aesthetics. Minsk: Propilei. (In Russian). Retrieved from URL: http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000966/index.shtml (2022, September, 2).
12.
12. Ishhenko, N. I. (2016). Martin Heidegger`s Dasein Analytics and the Problem of Temporality. Artikul`t, 4 (24). Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/analitika-dasein-martina-haydeggera-i-problema-vremennosti (2022, September, 2). (In Russian).
13.
13. Kozhevnikova, M. N. (2013). Dewey’s concept of “Growth-development” as a method and result. Philosophy of Education, 5, 122–130. (In Russian)
14.
14. Kozhevnikova, M. N. (2020). The Phenomenon of Subjectivity: Problems of Interpretation. Values and Meanings, 6 (70), 31–45. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24411/2071-6427-2020-10053.
15.
15. Kozhevnikova, M. N. (2022). Opyt cheloveka. Human experience. (On the understanding of human education). Scientific monograph. Saint Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy. 228 p. (In Russian).
16.
16. Kropotkin, P. A. (1991). Ethics. Moscow: Publishing house of foreign literature. Retrieved from https://iphras.ru/elib/Kropotkin_Eth.html (2022, September, 2). (In Russian).
17.
17. K`erkegor, S. (1994). Harmonious development in the human personality of aesthetic and ethical principles. Pleasure and duty (pp. 313–314). Kiev: AirLand. (In Russian).
18.
18. Lakan, Zh. (2006). Introduction to reality. Seminars. Book 7. Ethics of psychoanalysis. Moscow: Logos. 310 p. (In Russian).
19.
19. Larry, A., & Moore, M. (2021). “Deontological Ethics”. The Stan-ford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (Eds.). Retrieved from URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/ethics-deontological/ (2022, September, 2).
20.
20. Sartr, Zh. P. (1988). First Attitude Toward Others: Love, Language, Masochism (translated by V. V. Bibikhin). Problem of man in western philosophy. Moscow: Progress. 208 p. (In Russian).
21.
21. Sartr, Zh. P. (2000). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology (translated from French, preface, note by V. I. Kolyadko). Moscow: Respublika. 639 p. (In Russian).
22.
22. Sysoev, T. A. (2019). Boredom and laziness: philosophical and ethical analysis. Philosophy and Society, 3, 106–125. (In Russian).